Jamaat-ul-Ahrar and Terrorist Association

Executive Summary

Islamic State – Khorasan (ISKP) has become quite active in recent days, in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Granted, we expect them to be active in Afghanistan, where they are fighting for legitimacy against the Taliban, the Afghan National Army and the US-led military force. In Pakistan, however, where they have no foothold, no matter what the media would like to report, they are attempting to strike fear into Pakistani hearts.

That’s the top-level of this conversation, but the details that go into understanding the complexities and intricacies are much more difficult. As a point of fact, we will use the most recent statement released by Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) Jamaat-ul-Ahrar (JuA).

On the 17th July, 2017, Asad Mansoor, Spokesperson – Tehreek-E-Taliban Pakistan (Jamaat ul Ahrar), issued a statement refuting the Pakistan Army statement that they are part of ISIS/Daesh. It is this statement that we will use to deconstruct their argument.

“Yesterday, the spokesperson of na pak army (Pakistan Army) described that Jamaat ul Ahrar is a secondary group of Daesh.”

Army is commencing an operation against it.

Such a statement lies utterly on a pure propaganda and is a coward act of na pak army.

After a series of setbacks in Operation Ghazi (the TTP current operation) faced by army and proved comprehensively helpless to counter this operation, army followed a shameful path of a blame game.

When army realized that they have to face an embarrassment in a so-called operation Rad ul Fasad, they decided to launch yet again a new operation with a different name.

This move is nothing but an ultimate confession of their defeat.

While announcing the beginning of the new operation, army declared it to aim at Daesh, and revealed that there are several sub-groups of Daesh in this area particularly Jamaat ul-Ahrar is one of such groups.

Whereas, our respected Ameer, Khalid Khorasani had long ago made it clear that we do not belong to Daesh whatsoever. We absolutely deny this baseless claim.

Today one more time, we explain that we are not associated with Daesh.

We are not based in Daesh’s controlled areas neither do we use their routes for our movement and so is true for Daesh in terms of our controlled areas.

There is no existence of Jamaat ul Ahrar in the areas where a new operation hasbeen initiated.

A few days earlier, UN Security Council pronounced Jamat ul Ahrar a terrorist organization. This condemnable action taken by the UN is an explicit sign of a dual policy of Pak govt and na pak army.

We have a comprehensive nature of legit demands with the na pak army and they shall not be defined in the light of any sort of terrorism.

Our struggle is founded on an unmistakable manifesto. Jamaat ul Ahrar is going to launch a legal action in this regard.

It is important to make notice of these cunning actions of na pak army which are nothing but a failed attempt to divert the aim of Jamaat ul Ahrar off the Pak govt and entangle it into aimless efforts.

Let it be clear to all of the institutes of Pak that should it be a complete and solid peace in the whole world or every nation of this planet Earth is engaged in a war, our goal is to see Pakistan a pure and consolidated Islamic state Insha’Allah and for that we would be on our toes until the dream is realized. Inshallah.

Asad Mansoor

Spokesperson – Tehreek-E-Taliban Pakistan (Jamaat ul Ahrar)

Monday. July 17th, 2017

Full report · PDF

Jamaat-ul-Ahrar and Terrorist Association

PDF · Published July 26, 2017
Download the PDF

Related dossiers

The Taliban and Europe’s Fear of Migrants

European governments are negotiating directly with the Taliban to speed deportations, and the contact is drifting toward de facto recognition. What has been agreed, what Kabul wants in return, and how Pakistan and a blocked US plan fit the same picture.

GCTA Foresight Audit, Part 11: Closing Synthesis and the Series Scorecard

We scored 41 forecasts from our April 2026 assessment: 8 confirmed, 18 partly confirmed, 4 not confirmed and 11 open. The direction was right more often than the detail. The headline statistics match the Global Terrorism Index, but three claims in the policy chapter do not survive the public record.

GCTA Foresight Audit, Part 10: Cyber-Kinetic Convergence

Most of our cyber-kinetic chapter describes events that had already happened, and most of those hold up: the AWS data center strikes, the Jerusalem camera hacks and record GPS jamming. We scored two forward-looking calls, both partly confirmed, 1 of 2. The actors we named for the industrial-control threat are not the ones the record shows.

GCTA Foresight Audit, Part 9: ISKP, the Islamic State’s Engine Room

We scored four judgments from our April 2026 assessment on Islamic State Khorasan Province: three partly confirmed and one open, 1.5 of 3. ISKP is a propaganda innovator with external intent, but the UN describes a group rebuilding after setbacks, and we found no coordinated Western campaign and no proof of the funding flows we described.

GCTA Foresight Audit, Part 6: North Africa, Southeast Asia and the Sulu Sea

We scored three judgments from our April 2026 assessment on Southeast Asia, the Sulu Sea and North Africa: one partly confirmed and two open, 0.5 of 1. Online youth radicalization is real, but we found no urban attack, no ISKP link and no maritime drone incident. Five specific claims have no public support.